Ethical Considerations in Clinical Neuroscience
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 27 (10) , 1903-1909
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.10.1903
Abstract
Background Ethical decision making in clinical trials has become increasingly emphasized at many levels of the review process. Summary of Review Ethical concepts applicable to neuroclinical trials are reviewed. The discussion is directed toward ethical concerns that investigators must consider and justify prior to institutional review board submission. Risk-benefit analysis, methodology (randomization, placebo, design), and consent (informed, deferred, waived) are reviewed and guidelines of the Office for Protection From Research Risk are described. Conclusions Investigators proposing neuroclinical trials face increasing ethical scrutiny by institutional review boards. Attention to ethical issues early in the trial planning process is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pitfalls and biases in the reporting and interpretation of the results of clinical trialsLung Cancer, 1994
- A new proposal for benefit-less-risk analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Nazi Science — The Dachau Hypothermia ExperimentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Effect of nimodipine on the outcome of patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgeryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1988
- Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patientsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1988
- A Controlled Trial of Nimodipine in Acute Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Ethics and Human ExperimentationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Testing a readable writing approach to text revision.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
- The Ethics of the Randomized Clinical TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982