Investigating the trend characteristics of the Australian business cycle
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics
- Vol. 25 (5) , 695-701
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849300000016
Abstract
The non-stationarity tests of Phillips-Perron (1988) (PP tests) suggest that Australian macroeconomic output possesses a stochastic rather than a deterministic log-linear trend. Kwiatkowski et al. (1991) argue that such tests have low power and propose the KPSS test, in which the null is stationary. However, the KPSS test results reinforce the PP findings for Australia. Cochrane (1988) variance ratio (VR) tests further suggest that there may be a very strong random-walk component in the Australian business cycle. Rappoport and Reichlin (1989), however, argue that all such tests are biased in favour of the stochastic trend alternative if there are trend breaks in the data. Following up on this point, the paper finds that, in Australia's case, the stochastic trend alternative is statistically dominated when the data are allowed to be characterized by a probabilistic, regime-switching, segmented trend specification. Therefore, to the extent that real business-cycle theories of the business cycle gain support from stochastic trends in real output, this latter piece of Australian evidence does not strengthen their case.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integration Versus Trend Stationary in Time SeriesEconometrica, 1992
- The Australian Business Cycle: Its Definition and Existence*Economic Record, 1991
- Analysis of time series subject to changes in regimeJournal of Econometrics, 1990
- A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business CycleEconometrica, 1989
- Segmented Trends and Non-Stationary Time SeriesThe Economic Journal, 1989
- How Big Is the Random Walk in GNP?Journal of Political Economy, 1988
- Testing for a unit root in time series regressionBiometrika, 1988
- Are Output Fluctuations Transitory?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- Pitfalls in the Use of Time as an Explanatory Variable in RegressionJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1984
- Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootEconometrica, 1981