Non‐random sampling in human genetics: Estimation of familial correlations, model testing, and interpretation
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 6 (5) , 629-646
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060511
Abstract
By choice or necessity, human geneticists and genetic epidemiologists often design studies that involve non‐random sampling of clusters of individuals, and yet address hypotheses appropriate to the population as a whole. Failure to adjust for the non‐randomness of data often leads to biased parameter estimates and misspecification of predictive models that cause familial resemblance of traits. We develop an approach to adjust for common forms of non‐randomness in the context of estimating familial correlation with minimal distributional assumptions and discuss its implications in connection with adjustments for concomitant variables.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonrandom Sampling in Human Genetics: Familial CorrelationsMathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA, 1984
- Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysisAnnals of Human Genetics, 1982
- Bias in the estimation of heritability from truncated samples of twinsBehavior Genetics, 1982
- The Effect of Nonrandom Sampling on Familial CorrelationsPublished by JSTOR ,1982
- The Muscatine Cholesterol Family Study: Distribution of cholesterol levels within families of probands with high, low and middle cholesterol levelsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1982
- Increased coronary mortality in relatives of hypercholesterolemic school children: the Muscatine study.Circulation, 1979
- Analysis of genetic and environmental sources of variation in serum cholesterol in Tecumseh, Michigan. V. Variance components estimated from pedigreesAnnals of Human Genetics, 1979
- A General Model for the Genetic Analysis of Pedigree DataHuman Heredity, 1971
- Aspects of the Tecumseh Study: Population StudiesPublic Health Reports (1896-1970), 1961