In Vivo Articular Cartilage Contact Kinematics of the Knee
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 33 (1) , 102-107
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504265577
Abstract
Background: Quantifying the in vivo cartilage contact mechanics of the knee may improve our understanding of the mechanisms of joint degeneration and may therefore improve the surgical repair of the joint after injury. Objective: To measure tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact kinematics during in vivo knee flexion. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Orthogonal fluoroscopic images and magnetic resonance image–based computer models were used to measure the motion of the cartilage contact points during a quasi-static lunge in 5 human subjects. Results: On the tibial plateau, the contact point moved in both the anteroposterior and the mediolateral directions during knee flexion. On the medial tibial plateau, flexion angle did not have a statistically significant effect on the location of the contact points. The total translation of the contact point from full extension to 90° of flexion was less than 1.5 mm in the anteroposterior direction, whereas the translation in the mediolateral direction was more than 5.0 mm. In the anteroposterior direction, the contact points were centered on the medial tibial plateau. On the lateral tibial plateau, there was a statistically significant difference between the location of the contact point at full extension and the locations of the contact points at other flexion angles in the anteroposterior direction. No significant difference was detected between the location of the contact points at other flexion angles. The overall range of contact point motion was about 9.0 mm in the anteroposterior direction and about 4.0 mm in the mediolateral direction. The contact points were primarily on the inner half of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus (the half closest to the tibial spine). The contact points on both femoral condyles were also on the inner half of the condyles (near the condylar notch). Conclusions: The tibiofemoral contact points move in 3 dimensions during weightbearing knee flexion. The medial tibiofemoral contact points remained within the central portion of the tibial plateau in the anteroposterior direction. Both the medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact points were located on the inner portions of the tibial plateau and femoral condyles (close to the tibial spine), indicating that the tibial spine may play an important role in knee stability. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study may provide important insight as to the mechanisms contributing to the development of osteoarthritis after ligament injuries.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feasibility of Using Orthogonal Fluoroscopic Images to Measure In Vivo Joint KinematicsJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2004
- In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human KneeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
- Frequency and topography of lesions of the femoro-tibial cartilage at spiral CT arthrography of the knee: a study in patients with normal knee radiographs and without history of traumaSkeletal Radiology, 2002
- In Vivo Three-Dimensional Knee Kinematics Using a Biplanar Image-Matching TechniqueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- In vivo measurement of 3-D skeletal kinematics from sequences of biplane radiographs: Application to knee kinematicsIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2001
- A Validated Three-Dimensional Computational Model of a Human Knee JointJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1999
- Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degenerationOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1999
- Athletics and OsteoarthritisThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1997
- Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanismJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1987
- Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic designJournal of Biomechanics, 1985