Separation of base allele and sampling term effects gives new insights in variance component QTL analysis
Open Access
- 8 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomic Data
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-8-1
Abstract
Variance component (VC) models are commonly used for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) mapping in outbred populations. Here, the QTL effect is given as a random effect and a critical part of the model is the relationship between the phenotypic values and the random effect. In the traditional VC model, each individual has a unique QTL effect and the relationship between these random effects is given as a covariance structure (known as the identity-by-descent (IBD) matrix). We present an alternative notation of the variance component model, where the elements of the random effect are independent base generation allele effects and sampling term effects. The relationship between the phenotypic vales and the random effect is given by an incidence matrix, which results in a novel, but statistically equivalent, version of the traditional VC model. A general algorithm to estimate this incidence matrix is presented. Since the model is given in terms of base generation allele effects and sampling term effects, these effects can be estimated separately using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). From simulated data, we showed that biallelic QTL effects could be accurately clustered using the BLUP obtained from our model notation when markers are fully informative, and that the accuracy increased with the size of the QTL effect. We also developed a measure indicating whether a base generation marker homozygote is a QTL heterozygote or not, by comparing the variances of the sampling term BLUP and the base generation allele BLUP. A ratio greater than one gives strong support for a QTL heterozygote. We developed a simple presentation of the VC QTL model for identification of base generation allele effects in QTL linkage analysis. The base generation allele effects and sampling term effects were separated in our model notation. This clarifies the assumptions of the model and should also enhance the development of genome scan methods.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigreesGenetic Epidemiology, 2006
- An efficient variance component approach implementing an average information REML suitable for combined LD and linkage mapping with a general complex pedigreeGenetics Selection Evolution, 2006
- Mapping quantitative trait loci in humans: achievements and limitationsJournal of Clinical Investigation, 2005
- Precision of methods for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markersGenetics Selection Evolution, 2002
- Evidence for linkage of regions on chromosomes 6 and 11 to plasma glucose concentrations in Mexican Americans.Genome Research, 1996
- The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemesGenetics Selection Evolution, 1996
- Covariance between relatives for a marked quantitative trait locusGenetics Selection Evolution, 1995
- That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random EffectsStatistical Science, 1991
- Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased predictionGenetics Selection Evolution, 1989
- The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locusBehavior Genetics, 1972