Predicting the Daily Covariance Matrix for S&P 100 Stocks Using Intraday Data—But Which Frequency to Use?
- 19 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Econometric Reviews
- Vol. 27 (1-3) , 199-229
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930701873333
Abstract
This article investigates the merits of high-frequency intraday data when forming mean-variance efficient stock portfolios with daily rebalancing from the individual constituents of the S&P 100 index. We focus on the issue of determining the optimal sampling frequency as judged by the performance of these portfolios. The optimal sampling frequency ranges between 30 and 65 minutes, considerably lower than the popular five-minute frequency, which typically is motivated by the aim of striking a balance between the variance and bias in covariance matrix estimates due to market microstructure effects such as non-synchronous trading and bid-ask bounce. Bias-correction procedures, based on combining low-frequency and high-frequency covariance matrix estimates and on the addition of leads and lags do not substantially affect the optimal sampling frequency or the portfolio performance. Our findings are also robust to the presence of transaction costs and to the portfolio rebalancing frequency.Bias-correction, High-frequency data, Mean-variance analysis, Realized volatility, Tracking error, Volatility timing,Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using High-Frequency Data in Dynamic Portfolio ChoiceEconometric Reviews, 2008
- Semi-Parametric Modelling of Correlation DynamicsPublished by Emerald Publishing ,2005
- A Tale of Two Time ScalesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2005
- Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints HelpsThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- Modeling and Forecasting Realized VolatilityEconometrica, 2003
- Rolling-Sample Volatility EstimatorsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2002
- The distribution of realized stock return volatilityPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk ModelThe Review of Financial Studies, 1999
- Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models do Provide Accurate ForecastsInternational Economic Review, 1998
- Continuous Record Asymptotics for Rolling Sample Variance EstimatorsEconometrica, 1996