Operator variability in disease detection and grading by colposcopy in patients with mild dysplastic smears
- 1 November 1995
- Vol. 76 (9) , 1601-1605
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19951101)76:9<1601::aid-cncr2820760916>3.0.co;2-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver variability of cervical smears with squamous‐cell abnormalities: A philadelphia studyDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1994
- Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zoneThe Lancet, 1994
- Grading colposcopic appearance: paired comparison between two methods for differentiating benign papillomaviral infection from high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervixInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1991
- AN INTERNATIONAL TERMINOLOGY OF COLPOSCOPY: REPORT OF THE NOMENCLATURE COMMITTEE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CERVICAL PATHOLOGY AND COLPOSCOPYObstetrics & Gynecology, 1991
- Large loop excision of the transformation zoneThe Lancet, 1991
- Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smearGynecologic Oncology, 1989
- The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smearsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?BMJ, 1987
- DOES MILD ATYPIA ON A CERVICAL SMEAR WARRANT FURTHER INVESTIGATION?The Lancet, 1986
- Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986