Phase II Studies of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Heavily and Minimally Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (13) , 2163-2169
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.4839
Abstract
Cisplatin and gemcitabine have single-agent activity in metastatic breast cancer, and preclinical data support synergy of the combination. Two parallel, phase II trials were conducted to evaluate the response rate, response duration, and toxicities of the combination. Genetic polymorphisms were analyzed for correlation with outcomes. Eligible women had measurable disease and heavily or minimally pretreated metastatic breast cancer. The heavily pretreated protocol required prior anthracycline and taxane therapy; cisplatin as part of high-dose therapy was allowed. All patients received cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 through 4 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 2 and 8 of a 21-day cycle with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the heavily pretreated group. Sera from a subset of patients were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism for polymorphisms in 10 genes of interest. Of 136 women enrolled, 74 were heavily pretreated. Both protocols accrued to their two-stage design. The response rate for both the heavily and minimally pretreated cohorts was 26%, and the median durations of response were 5.3 and 5.9 months, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, hormone receptor–negative disease was associated with a higher response rate. The most common grades 3 or 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (71%), neutropenia (66%), and anemia (38%). In a subset of 55 patients, the xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD)–751, x-ray cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) and cytidine deaminase polymorphisms were significantly associated with clinical outcomes. Combination cisplatin and gemcitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer regardless of prior therapy. Genetic polymorphisms may tailor which patients benefit from this regimen.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase III study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupAnnals of Oncology, 2007
- Polymorphisms inXRCC1,XRCC3, andCCND1and Survival After Treatment for Metastatic Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancerAnti-Cancer Drugs, 2006
- Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes modulate survival in cisplatin/gemcitabine-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patientsAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- Adjuvant Docetaxel for Node-Positive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Paclitaxel After Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From NSABP B-28Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene Polymorphisms and Recurrence after Treatment for Superficial Bladder CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Genetic variation in XPD predicts treatment outcome and risk of acute myeloid leukemia following chemotherapyBlood, 2004
- Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trialLung Cancer, 2003
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989