CD45‐assisted PanLeucogating for accurate, cost‐effective dual‐platform CD4+ T‐cell enumeration
Open Access
- 15 April 2002
- Vol. 50 (2) , 69-77
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10068
Abstract
BACKGROUND North American and European guidelines for dual-platform (DP) flow cytometry recommend absolute CD4 T-cell counts to be calculated from two parameters: the absolute lymphocyte counts obtained on a hematology analyzer and the percentages of CD4+ cells among lymphocytes (CD4%/lympho) obtained by flow cytometry. Nevertheless, the identification of lymphocytes is error-prone: a poor match between these common denominators in the two systems is the main source of inaccuracy. In contrast, total leucocyte counts (white cell counts [WCC]) and CD4% among the gated CD45+ leucocytes (CD4%/leuco) can be determined with greater accuracy. Methods: We introduced “PanLeucogating,” i.e., we used total leucocytes as the common denominator for improving the precision of DP absolute CD4 counting. Correlations and Bland-Altman tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: First, 22 stabilized blood product samples were provided by U.K. National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) and a higher accuracy and precision of CD4 counts were documented using PanLeucogating compared with lymphocyte gating. Next, 183 fresh and 112 fixed (TransFix) whole blood samples were used to compare DP methods and single-platform (SP) methodology, including both volumetric and bead-based techniques. A particularly high correlation and comparable precision of absolute CD4 counts were observed between the SP volumetric method and DP PanLeucogating (R2 = 0.990; bias 6 ± SD 17%). The SP volumetric method showed lower levels of agreement with the DP lymphocyte gating (R2 = 0.758; bias 14 ± SD 51%) and with the SP bead-based method (R2 = 0.923; bias 4 ±SD 31%). Conclusions: These observations show that DP leucocyte counts (WCC) should replace lymphocyte counts as the “common denominator” although CD4%/lympho values can, as an extra step, be also provided readily if requested. When coupled with quality control for WCC on hematology analyzers, the DP method with CD45 PanLeucogating represents a robust CD4 T-cell assay that is as accurate as the SP volumetric technique. This DP method uses only two, CD45 and CD4, antibody reagents and can be run on any pair of hematological analyzer plus flow cytometer. Cytometry (Clin. Cytometry) 50:69–77, 2002.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affordable CD4+ T-cell counts on ‘single-platform’ flow cytometers I. Primary CD4 gatingBritish Journal of Haematology, 2000
- Evaluation of TruCount Absolute-Count Tubes for Determining CD4 and CD8 Cell Numbers in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive AdultsClinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2000
- Quality assessment of CD34+ stem cell enumeration: experience of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) using a unique stable whole blood preparationBritish Journal of Haematology, 1998
- Guidelines for the enumeration of CD4+ T lymphocytes in immunosuppressed individualsClinical and Laboratory Haematology, 1997
- Evaluation of a novel stable whole blood quality control material for lymphocyte subset analysis: Results from the UK NEQAS immune monitoring schemeCytometry, 1996
- Standardization of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts across laboratories: An evaluation of the ortho CytoronAbsolute flow cytometry system on normal donorsCytometry, 1995
- Immunologic differentiation of absolute lymphocyte count with an integrated flow cytometric system: A new concept for absolute T cell subset determinationsCytometry, 1995
- CD4 T‐lymphocyte determinations on whole blood specimens using a single‐tube three‐color assayCytometry, 1993
- Results of the flow cytometry ACTG quality control program: Analysis and findingsClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986