Cross-Modal Object Recognition Is Viewpoint-Independent
Open Access
- 12 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 2 (9) , e890
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000890
Abstract
Previous research suggests that visual and haptic object recognition are viewpoint-dependent both within- and cross-modally. However, this conclusion may not be generally valid as it was reached using objects oriented along their extended y-axis, resulting in differential surface processing in vision and touch. In the present study, we removed this differential by presenting objects along the z-axis, thus making all object surfaces more equally available to vision and touch. Participants studied previously unfamiliar objects, in groups of four, using either vision or touch. Subsequently, they performed a four-alternative forced-choice object identification task with the studied objects presented in both unrotated and rotated (180° about the x-, y-, and z-axes) orientations. Rotation impaired within-modal recognition accuracy in both vision and touch, but not cross-modal recognition accuracy. Within-modally, visual recognition accuracy was reduced by rotation about the x- and y-axes more than the z-axis, whilst haptic recognition was equally affected by rotation about all three axes. Cross-modal (but not within-modal) accuracy correlated with spatial (but not object) imagery scores. The viewpoint-independence of cross-modal object identification points to its mediation by a high-level abstract representation. The correlation between spatial imagery scores and cross-modal performance suggest that construction of this high-level representation is linked to the ability to perform spatial transformations. Within-modal viewpoint-dependence appears to have a different basis in vision than in touch, possibly due to surface occlusion being important in vision but not touch.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perceptionNeuropsychologia, 2007
- Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effectsThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006
- Object-spatial imagery: a new self-report imagery questionnaireApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2006
- Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1999
- Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeysCurrent Biology, 1995
- Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review, 1987
- Coordinating visual and kinaesthetic memory codesBritish Journal of Psychology, 1979
- Human information processing and sensory modality: Cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit.Psychological Bulletin, 1974