Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache.
- 22 May 1982
- Vol. 284 (6328) , 1519-1523
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1519
Abstract
Backache is common yet its routine medical assessment is imprecise, unreliable, and poorly interpreted. Reproducibility studies on 475 patients improved the reliability of clinical interview and examination in backache, while studies of 335 normal subjects defined the limits of normality. Assessment of nerve function was found to be reliable but assessment of the back itself had to be considerably modified and examination improved by incorporating actual measurements. The validity and clinical utility of the information were analysed to determine the minimum amount of information which should be collected to permit clear diagnosis and management.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonorganic Physical Signs in Low-Back PainSpine, 1980
- Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability QuestionnairePublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1980
- Reliability and Reproducibility of Clinical Findings In Low-Back PainSpine, 1979
- The Pain Drawing as an Aid to the Psychologic Evaluation of Patients With Low-Back PainSpine, 1976
- Observer variation in assessment of results of surgery for peptic ulceration.BMJ, 1976
- Observer Variation in Clinical Diagnosis - A Computer-Aided Assessment of its Magnitude and Importance in 552 Patients with Abdominal PainMethods of Information in Medicine, 1973
- Difference Between Patients' and Doctors' Interpretation of Some Common Medical TermsBMJ, 1970
- OBSERVERS' ERRORS IN TAKING MEDICAL HISTORIESThe Lancet, 1951