Early lexical acquisition: the role of cross-situational learning
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in First Language
- Vol. 19 (57) , 347-358
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379901905703
Abstract
Several theorists have proposed that children may learn the meaning of a new word by paying attention to the element that remains constant across multiple uses of that word. The current study presents a direct test of this hypothesis. Two-, three- and four-year-olds (N = 24 in each group) were presented with novel objects that differed systematically in shape and texture. Children were shown one target object and were told 'This is a modi one'. In the Shape condition, two objects that matched the target object in shape (and differed in texture) were also labelled 'modi ones'. In the Texture condition, the two objects matched the target in texture (and differed in shape). Subsequent tests indicated that, in extending the novel adjective to other exemplars, children in all age groups attended to the consistent element across naming contexts. Implications for theories of lexical acquisition are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two‐year‐olds learn words for absent objects and actionsBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1996
- Morphological cues to verb meaning: verb inflections and the initial mapping of verb meaningsJournal of Child Language, 1995
- How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics?Lingua, 1994
- When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growthLingua, 1994
- Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisitionLingua, 1994
- Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word referenceJournal of Child Language, 1993
- Infants' Contribution to the Achievement of Joint ReferenceChild Development, 1991
- The Structural Sources of Verb MeaningsLanguage Acquisition, 1990
- The importance of shape in early lexical learningCognitive Development, 1988
- Overextensions and underextensions: how different are they?Journal of Child Language, 1982