A Comprehensive Evaluation of Rhythm Monitoring Strategies for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence
Open Access
- 14 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 126 (7) , 806-814
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.098079
Abstract
Background—: Intermittent rhythm monitoring (IRM) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is employed to evaluate the success of therapeutic interventions. In a large population of patients with continuous monitoring (CM), we investigated the sensitivity of various frequencies and durations of IRM strategies on the detection of AF recurrence, the dynamics behind AF recurrence detection, and we describe measures to evaluate temporal AF recurrence. Methods and Results—: Rhythm histories of 647 patients (mean AF burden, 0.12±0.22; median, 0.014; 687 patient-years) with implantable CM devices were reconstructed and analyzed. With the use of computationally intensive simulation, the sensitivity of IRM of various frequencies and durations on the identification of AF recurrence was evaluated. Prolonged-duration IRM was superior to shorter IRM ( P P P <0.0001). Patients with high-density, low-burden AF benefit the most from CM for detection of AF recurrence. Conclusions—: IRM follow-up is significantly inferior to CM. IRM strategies will not identify AF recurrence in a great proportion of patients at risk. Temporal AF characteristics play a significant role in AF recurrence detection with the use of IRM. For the scientific, evidence-based evaluation of AF treatments, CM should be strongly recommended. Prospective studies are required to evaluate whether CM to guide clinical management can also improve patient outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00806689.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Incidence of Newly Detected Atrial Arrhythmias via Implantable Devices in Patients With a History of Thromboembolic EventsStroke, 2010
- The Relationship Between Daily Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden From Implantable Device Diagnostics and Stroke RiskCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2009
- Twenty-Four–Hour Holter Monitor Follow-Up Does Not Provide Accurate Heart Rhythm Status After Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation TherapyCirculation, 2009
- HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-UpA report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society.EP Europace, 2007
- Comparison of continuous versus intermittent monitoring of atrial arrhythmiasHeart Rhythm, 2006
- Perception of Atrial Fibrillation Before and After Radiofrequency Catheter AblationCirculation, 2005
- Role of transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring in detecting short-term arrhythmia recurrences after radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Relationship between atrial tachyarrhythmias and symptomsHeart Rhythm, 2005
- Accuracy of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Detection in Implantable Devices with Arrhythmia TherapiesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2004