Selection of radiocontrast media in cardiac catheterization: Comparative physiology and clinical effects of nonionic monomeric and ionic dimeric formulations

This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:

• Thrombotic and cardiovascular complications related to nonionic contrast media during cardiac catheterization: Analysis of 8,517 patients
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
• Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on coronary diameter and blood flow in chronically instrumented dogs
  American Heart Journal, 1989
• Induction of ventricular arrhythmia by high and low osmolarity ionic and nonionic contrast media
  American Heart Journal, 1989
• Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
• Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using HexabrixTM or RenografinTM in high-risk patients
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
• Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: A randomized double-blind study
  American Heart Journal, 1986
• Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
• Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography: An analysis of mechanisms
  American Heart Journal, 1985
• Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
• Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): Advantages over standard ionic agents
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1983