The case for the Stanford‐Binet L‐M as a supplemental test
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Roeper Review
- Vol. 15 (1) , 34-37
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553454
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Test reviewsRoeper Review, 1992
- A New Binet, an Old Premise: A Mismatch between Technology and Evolving PracticeJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1990
- Leta Hollingworth's contributions to above‐level testing of the giftedRoeper Review, 1990
- The diverse profile of the extremely gifted childRoeper Review, 1987
- The demise of the Stanford-Binet Scale.Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 1987
- Giftedness, intelligence and the New Stanford‐BinetRoeper Review, 1986
- Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test in Thailand and in Denmark: A ResponseSchool Psychology International, 1983
- David Wechsler (1896-1981).American Psychologist, 1981
- Mr. Binet’s Test 70 Years LaterEducational Researcher, 1975
- PRINCIPLE OF INDIVIDUATION AND CO‐ORDINATES OF CONDUCT*British Journal of Psychology, 1956