Antioxidants vitamin C and vitamin E for the prevention and treatment of cancer
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 21 (7) , 735-744
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00483.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence of the supplements vitamin C and vitamin E for treatment and prevention of cancer. METHODS: Systematic review of trials and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies showed scant evidence that vitamin C or vitamin E beneficially affects survival. In the ATBC Cancer Prevention Study Group, no statistically significant effect of treatment was seen for any cancer individually, and our pooled relative risk (regardless of tumor type) for α-tocopherol alone was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 1.12). All cause mortality was not significant. In the Linxian General Population Trial, the relative risks for cancer death for vitamin C (combined with molybdenum) was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.21) and for vitamin E (combined with β-carotene and selenium) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.00). We identified only 3 studies that reported statistically significant beneficial results: vitamin C (in combination with BCG) was found to be beneficial in a single trial of bladder cancer and vitamin E (in combination with ω-3 fatty acid) increased survival in patients with advanced cancer. In the ATBC trial, in analyses of 6 individual cancers, the prevention of prostate cancer in subjects treated with α-tocopherol was statistically significant (RR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review of the literature does not support the hypothesis that the use of supplements of vitamin C or vitamin E in the doses tested helps prevent and/or treat cancer in the populations tested. There were isolated findings of benefit, which require confirmation.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ascorbic Acid Does Not Cure CancerPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2009
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Gastric Cancer and Premalignant Lesions in Atrophic Gastritis: A Controlled Trial on the Effect of Supplementation with Alpha-Tocopherol and Beta-CaroteneScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Linxian nutrition intervention trials design, methods, participant characteristics, and complianceAnnals of Epidemiology, 1993
- Antioxidant vitamins or lactulose for the prevention of the recurrence of colorectal adenomasDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- High-Dose Vitamin C versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Cancer Who Have Had No Prior ChemotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Failure of High-Dose Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) Therapy to Benefit Patients with Advanced CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979