Peginterferon alpha‐2a is associated with higher sustained virological response than peginterferon alfa‐2b in chronic hepatitis C
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 51 (4) , 1176-1184
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23504
Abstract
A combination of weekly pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alpha and daily ribavirin represents the standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C according to current guidelines. It is not established which of the two licensed products (peginterferon alpha‐2a or peginterferon alfa‐2b) is most effective. We performed a systematic review of head‐to‐head randomized trials to assess the benefits and harms of the two treatments. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS through July 2009. Using standardized forms, two reviewers independently extracted data from each eligible trial report. We statistically combined data using a random effects meta‐analysis according to the intention‐to‐treat principle. We identified 12 randomized clinical trials, including 5,008 patients, that compared peginterferon alpha‐2a plus ribavirin versus peginterferon alfa‐2b plus ribavirin. Overall, peginterferon alpha‐2a significantly increased the number of patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) versus peginterferon alfa‐2b (47% versus 41%; risk ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.19; P = 0.004 [eight trials]). Subgroup analyses of risk of bias, viral genotype, and treatment history yielded similar results. The meta‐analysis of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation included 11 trials and revealed no significant differences between the two peginterferons. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that peginterferon alpha‐2a is associated with higher SVR than peginterferon alfa‐2b. However, the paucity of evidence on adverse events curbs the decision to definitively recommend one peginterferon over the other, because any potential benefit must outweigh the risk of harm. (HEPATOLOGY 2010.)This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of hepatitis C virus and its treatment on survival†‡Hepatology, 2009
- Increased rate of death related to presence of viremia among hepatitis C virus antibody–positive subjects in a community‐based cohort study†Hepatology, 2009
- Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update # † ‡Hepatology, 2009
- Randomized trial comparing pegylated interferon α‐2b versus pegylated interferon α‐2a, both plus ribavirin, to treat chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus patients†Hepatology, 2009
- Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature AnalysisPLoS Medicine, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical ResearchJAMA, 2005
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002