Physiological importance of different atrioventricular intervals to improved exercise performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.
Open Access
- 1 January 1989
- Vol. 61 (1) , 46-51
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.61.1.46
Abstract
To determine the importance of different atrioventricular intervals during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers, seven patients with complete heart block and sinus rhythm were exercised in different pacing modes and atrioventricular intervals: (a) ventricular inhibited (VVI) pacing with no synchronous atrial augmentation or rate responsiveness; (b) atrial synchronous ventricular or DDD pacing with a short mean (SD) atrioventricular interval of 66 (4) ms; and (c) DDD pacing with a long atrioventricular interval of 168 (12) ms. Pacing with a short or long atrioventricular interval gave similar maximum heart rates, oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold, end tidal pressure of carbon dioxide or oxygen pulse (a measure of stroke volume). Pacing with either a short or long atrioventricular interval produced a significantly higher oxygen consumption and anaerobic threshold and less lactate production than VVI pacing. During exercise a short atrioventricular interval does not provide a better cardiopulmonary performance than a long atrioventricular interval.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimum AV Interval in Dual Chamber PacemakersPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Activity‐Sensing, Rate‐Responsive Pacing: Improvement in Myocardial Performance with ExercisePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- Physiologic Benefits of Rate ResponsivenessPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Physiological Benefits of Atrial Synchrony in Paced PatientsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Comparison of Resting Hemodynamic Indices and Exercise Performance During Atrial Synchronized and Asynchronous Ventricular PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Hemodynamic effects of acute atrioventricular sequential pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Comparison of physical work capacity and systolic time intervals with ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.Heart, 1981
- Hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular sequential pacing after cardiac surgeryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Hemodynamic sequelae of atrial, ventricular, and sequential atrioventricular pacing in cardiac patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1966
- Hemodynamic consequences of atrial and ventricular pacing in patients with normal and abnormal heartsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1965