Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology: The Need for Clarity, Transparency and Vision
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cancer Investigation
- Vol. 27 (6) , 593-597
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07357900903109952
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: Testing for KRAS Gene Mutations in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to Predict Response to Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody TherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyondBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working GroupGenetics in Medicine, 2009
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Opportunities and ChallengesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Impact of a 21‐gene RT‐PCR assay on treatment decisions in early‐stage breast cancerCancer, 2007
- Gene Expression Profile Assays as Predictors of Recurrence-Free Survival in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A MetaanalysisClinical Breast Cancer, 2006
- Gene Expression and Benefit of Chemotherapy in Women With Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1998