American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Opportunities and Challenges
- 20 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (24) , 4022-4026
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.7139
Abstract
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published its first clinical practice guideline, which focused on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors, in 1994. Since then, ASCO has published 24 additional guidelines or technology assessments on a range of topics and is developing 11 additional guidelines. Guidelines are among ASCO's most valued products, according to membership surveys and data from the JCO.org Web site. However, the same data from ASCO members have highlighted a number of limitations to the guideline program. These relate to the timelines of guideline updates, difficulties locating guidelines and related products, and challenges to implementing ASCO guidelines in everyday clinical practice. This article outlines the concrete steps that the ASCO Health Services Committee (HSC) is taking to address these limitations, including the institution of a more aggressive guideline updating schedule, a transition from narrative to systematic literature reviews to support the practice recommendations, a new Board of Directors–approved policy to permit endorsement of other groups’ guidelines, and a robust Clinical Tools and Resources program that offers a range of guideline dissemination and implementation aids. Additional work is underway to establish stronger and deeper collaborations with practicing oncologists to expand their role in the review, field testing, and implementation of guideline clinical tools and resources. Finally, the HSC is discussing evaluation of the guidelines program to maximize the impact of ASCO clinical practice guidelines on clinical decision making and, ultimately, the quality of cancer care.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors for prostate cancer preventionCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2008
- How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatmentCancer, 2007
- Impact of Primary Prophylaxis With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Febrile Neutropenia and Mortality in Adult Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early‐stage breast carcinomaCancer, 2005
- The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate dataBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2005
- Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review From the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care’s Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Survival differences related to estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) polymorphism and age in female patients with metastatic colon cancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice GuidelinesJAMA, 2001
- American Society of Clinical Oncology. Recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994