Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial
Top Cited Papers
- 19 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Hernia
- Vol. 12 (4) , 385-389
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1
Abstract
The aim of this prospective randomized multicenter trial was to evaluate the recurrence rates and complications of open versus laparoscopic repairs of inguinal hernias.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trialHernia, 2006
- Open Mesh versus Laparoscopic Mesh Repair of Inguinal HerniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repairCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003
- Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.1999
- Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparisonThe Lancet, 1999
- Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-Hernia RepairNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Results of a Multicenter TrialAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Laparoscopic or Open Inguinal Herniorrhaphy?Archives of Surgery, 1994
- The tension-free hernioplastyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1989