Measuringin
- 27 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 70 (7) , 074031
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.70.074031
Abstract
Defining a most economical parametrization of time-dependent decays, including a measurable phase which equals the weak phase in the limit of vanishing penguin amplitudes, we propose two ways for determining in this processes. We explain the limitation of one method, assuming only that two relevant tree amplitudes factorize and that their relative strong phase is negligible. The other method, based on broken flavor SU(3), permits a determination of in in an overconstrained system using also rate measurements of and . Current data are shown to restrict two ratios of penguin and tree amplitudes to a narrow range around 0.2 and to imply an upper bound . Assuming that is much smaller than 90°, we find and using BABAR and BELLE results for . Avoiding this assumption for completeness, we demonstrate the reduction of discrete ambiguities in with increased statistics and show that SU(3) breaking effects are effectively second order in .
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence forPhysical Review Letters, 2004
- Measurement of Branching Fractions and Charge Asymmetries in and Decays, and Search forPhysical Review Letters, 2004
- Use of early data onB→ρπdecaysPhysical Review D, 2000
- Measuringdecays and the unitarity anglePhysical Review D, 2000
- Model-independent electroweak penguin amplitudes inBdecays to two pseudoscalarsPhysical Review D, 1999
- A general analysis ofThe European Physical Journal C, 1999
- Measuringasymmetry indecays without ambiguitiesPhysical Review D, 1993
- Penguin trapping with isospin analysis andasymmetries indecaysPhysical Review D, 1991
- Elimination of penguin contributions to CP asymmetries in B decays through isospin analysisPhysics Letters B, 1991
- Isospin analysis ofCPasymmetries inBdecaysPhysical Review Letters, 1990