Mortality From Abortion and Childbirth
- 9 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 248 (2) , 192-196
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03330020036026
Abstract
Critics have challenged previous comparisons of mortality from legal abortion and childbirth for containing biases in the crude data that spuriously favor the safety of abortion. To evaluate this concern, we reviewed the sources of mortality data on which these comparisons are based and examined the completeness of abortion mortality statistics, the completeness of childbirth mortality statistics, and the accuracy of the denominators for both these events. We found the evidence to be consistent in two directions: (1) abortion deaths appear to be more completely ascertained than childbirth deaths; (2) use of different denominator estimates has relatively little impact on the comparison. From this evidence, we conclude that the crude data are biased in a direction that overestimates the abortion risks for the woman relative to the risks of childbearing. (JAMA1982;248:192-196)Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Surveillance of Maternal DeathsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1979
- THE REPORTING OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977
- INTENSIVE HEPATITIS SURVEILLANCE IN MINNESOTA: METHODS AND RESULTSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977
- Changing Maternal Mortality in MassachusettsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1957