Resume evaluations and cosmetics use: When more is not better
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Sex Roles
- Vol. 14 (1-2) , 51-58
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00287847
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- Relationship of Physical Appearance and Professional Demeanor to Interview Evaluations and Rankings of Medical Residency ApplicantsThe Journal of Psychology, 1983
- Applicant Attractiveness as a Perceived Job-Relevant Variable in Selection of Management Trainees.The Academy of Management Journal, 1982
- Interpersonal Attraction and Organizational Outcomes: A Field ExaminationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1981
- Impression Management in the Job InterviewPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
- Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972