Fetal weight estimation by three‐dimensional ultrasound
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 16 (5) , 445-452
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00249.x
Abstract
Objective: To assess the value of three‐dimensional volume scanning in predicting fetal weight at birth.Study design: Prospective cross‐sectional study within 7 days of delivery. A total of 190 patients were considered for final analysis (formula‐finding group: n = 125, formula evaluation group: n = 65). Inclusion criteria were a singleton pregnancy and absence of chromosomal or significant structural anomalies. Three‐dimensional (3D) volumetric measurements of the fetal thigh, upper arm and abdomen were performed together with conventional two‐dimensional (2D) biometry.Results: All measurements were completed successfully in each patient. Polynomial regression analysis with standard biometric parameters and volumes of the upper arm, the thigh and the abdomen was employed to yield the best‐fit formula for prediction of fetal weight at birth. The new 3D formula (estimated fetal weight (EFW) = −1478.557 + 7.242 × thigh volume + 13.309 × upper arm volume + 852.998 × log10 abdominal volume + 0.526 × BPD3) proved to be superior to established 2D equations with the lowest mean error (25.8 ± 194.4 g), the lowest mean absolute error (155.2 ± 118.2 g) and the lowest mean absolute percentage error (6.1 ± 5.0%) when studied prospectively in the evaluation group.Conclusion: 3D sonography allows superior fetal weight estimation by including soft tissue volume. Further studies at the extremes of fetal weight are needed to confirm the value of our formula in these subsets. Copyright © 2000 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of fetal macrosomia using humeral soft tissue thicknessPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Kann die 3D-Volumetrie von fetalem Oberarm und Oberschenkel konventionelle 2D-Gewichtsschätzungen verbessern?Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, 1999
- How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variablesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Modified Neonatal Growth Assessment Score: a multivariate approach to the detection of intrauterine growth retardation in the neonateUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Prospective study on fetal weight estimation using limb circumferences obtained by three-dimensional ultrasoundUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Measurement of limb circumferences with three‐dimensional ultrasound for fetal weight estimationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993
- Evaluation of fetal thigh circumference measurements: A comparative ultrasound and anatomical studyJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Über die sonographische Messung multipler fetaler KörperparameterUltraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, 1980
- Measurements of Liveborn Fetal Malnutrition Infants Compared with Similar Gestation and with Similar Birth Weight Normal ControlsNeonatology, 1970