Prescription of Gain-Setting and Prognosis for Use and Benefit of Post-Aural Hearing Aids
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 20 (2) , 157-176
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098109072692
Abstract
Degree of hearing aid use, aid gain setting and the improvement given by the aid in a speech identification task were determined for a sample of post-aural hearing aid users. Measures of the spectral effects of gain settings received by individuals suggested that the poor frequency responses of the aids examined severely restricted the overall gain and hence the frequency range of useful gain. The outcome variables of use, gain and improvement in identification were each examined in relation to a selection of audiological predictor variables that would be easily obtained clinically. Multiple-regression analysis furnished equations accounting for a considerable proportion of the variance in gain setting and in use and for a moderate proportion of the variance in the identification improvement score. These results suggest that it is valid to predict use on an individual basis when determining the emphasis of rehabilitative programmes and it is helpful to predict gain for individuals when advising them on the gain setting to be attempted. The patterns of correlations obtained justify determining the speech detection threshold and the uncomfortable loudness level in order to predict a most comfortable level and when assessing the benefit and use of an aid. Nous avons cherché dans quelle mesure une prévision en fonction d'un ensemble de données fournies par l'audiologie clinique était possible concernant la durée d'utilisation d'une prothèse, le réglage habituellement adopts ainsi que l'amelioration qu'elle pouvait procurer en audiométrie vocale. Nos analyses ont permis d'expliquer un pourcentage de variance assez grand parmi les sujets examinés. S'il nous apparaiˇt que des moyens manquent actuellement pour la prévision de l'amélioration en pourcentage d'intelligibilité, nous montrons toutefois qu'il est possible d'établir une prévision correcte en ce qui concerne l'utilisation et le gain graˇce à la prise en compte d'un niveau confortable d'audition calculé.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Loudness Discomfort Level and Most Comfortable Loudness JudgmentsJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1978
- Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aidsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- The use of High-Pass amplification for Broad-Frequency sensorineural hearing lossInternational Journal of Audiology, 1978
- Relationships between Comfortable Loudness Levels for Speech and Speech Discrimination in Sensorineural Hearing LossJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1977
- The Value of Some Suprathreshold Auditory MeasuresScandinavian Audiology, 1977
- Auditory-Visual Perception of SpeechJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1975
- Use of Hearing AIDS (Always, Often, Rarely, Never)Scandinavian Audiology, 1974
- Utilisation of Hearing Aids Issued by the National Health ServiceBritish Journal of Audiology, 1973
- Hearing Aid Gain Requirements in Sensori Neural Hearing LossBritish Journal of Audiology, 1973
- Experimental Studies on the Uncomfortable Loudness LevelJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971