Controversies around Lung Protective Mechanical Ventilation

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Meta-Analysis of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trials Testing Low Tidal Volumes
  American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
• Characteristics and Outcomes in Adult Patients Receiving Mechanical VentilationA 28-Day International Study
  JAMA, 2002
• Current and Projected Workforce Requirements for Care of the Critically Ill and Patients With Pulmonary DiseaseCan We Meet the Requirements of an Aging Population?
  JAMA, 2000
• Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
• Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients
  Critical Care Medicine, 1999
• Tidal Volume Reduction for Prevention of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998
• Evaluation of a Ventilation Strategy to Prevent Barotrauma in Patients at High Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
• Effect of a Protective-Ventilation Strategy on Mortality in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
• Misleading meta-analysis
  BMJ, 1995
• Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury.
  American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994