State, Social Elites, and Government Capacity in Southeast Asia
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 40 (2) , 252-268
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010364
Abstract
The signal performances of Southeast Asian countries in attaining economic growth and political stability are frequently explained by cultural and policy factors. Recent research suggests, however, that the role of the state is extensive and central to economic and political goals. The present approach to the comparative evaluation of state capacities attempts to account for the variations and nuances of the performance of Southeast Asian states. The structure of political support and available means of social control provide relatively greater capacity to state elites in Singapore and Malaysia, and less capacity to state elites in the Philippines and Indonesia; Thailand is an intermediate case.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- United States Support for the Marcos Administration and the Pressures that made for ChangeContemporary Southeast Asia, 1986
- The New People´s Army: A Nation‑wide Insurgency in the PhilippinesContemporary Southeast Asia, 1986
- Soeharto's Indonesia: Personal Rule and Political InstitutionsPublished by JSTOR ,1985
- Sovereignty en garde: negotiating with foreign investorsInternational Organization, 1985
- Thailand in Gramscian PerspectivePublished by JSTOR ,1984
- Political Participation and Its Regulation in Malaysia: Opposition to the Societies (Amendment) Act 1981Pacific Affairs, 1984
- Contending Political Forces in the Philippines Today: The Political Elite and the Legal OppositionContemporary Southeast Asia, 1983
- Corporatism in the ASEAN CountriesContemporary Southeast Asia, 1983
- Toward a Class Analysis of the Indonesian Military Bureaucratic StateIndonesia, 1978
- The Indonesian Military and Economic PolicyModern Asian Studies, 1976