Trial sample size, but not trial quality, is associated with positive study outcome
- 28 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (2) , 154-162
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007
- Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological TreatmentsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic ReviewPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Evidence based diagnosticsBMJ, 2005
- Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got whatThe Lancet, 2002
- Randomized clinical trials in Hepatology: Predictors of qualityHepatology, 1999
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995