Simulation and Projection of Arctic Freshwater Budget Components by the IPCC AR4 Global Climate Models
Open Access
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Vol. 8 (3) , 571-589
- https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm575.1
Abstract
The state-of-the-art AOGCM simulations have recently (late 2004–early 2005) been completed for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in order to provide input to the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). The present paper synthesizes the new simulations of both the twentieth- and twenty-first-century arctic freshwater budget components for use in the IPCC AR4, and attempts to determine whether demonstrable progress has been achieved since the late 1990s. Precipitation and its difference with evapotranspiration are addressed over the Arctic Ocean and its terrestrial watersheds, including the basins of the four major rivers draining into the Arctic Ocean: the Ob, the Yenisey, the Lena, and the Mackenzie. Compared to the previous [IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR)] generation of AOGCMs, there are some indications that the models as a class have improved in simulations of the Arctic precipitation. In spite of observational uncertainties, the models still appear to oversimulate area-a... Abstract The state-of-the-art AOGCM simulations have recently (late 2004–early 2005) been completed for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in order to provide input to the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). The present paper synthesizes the new simulations of both the twentieth- and twenty-first-century arctic freshwater budget components for use in the IPCC AR4, and attempts to determine whether demonstrable progress has been achieved since the late 1990s. Precipitation and its difference with evapotranspiration are addressed over the Arctic Ocean and its terrestrial watersheds, including the basins of the four major rivers draining into the Arctic Ocean: the Ob, the Yenisey, the Lena, and the Mackenzie. Compared to the previous [IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR)] generation of AOGCMs, there are some indications that the models as a class have improved in simulations of the Arctic precipitation. In spite of observational uncertainties, the models still appear to oversimulate area-a...Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulations of Arctic Temperature and Pressure by Global Coupled ModelsJournal of Climate, 2007
- Sea ice evolution over the 20th and 21st centuries as simulated by current AOGCMsOcean Modelling, 2006
- Application of a Comprehensive Bias-Correction Model to Precipitation Measured at Russian North Pole Drifting StationsJournal of Hydrometeorology, 2002
- ReplyJournal of Climate, 2002
- Twentieth-Century Trends of Arctic Precipitation from Observational Data and a Climate Model SimulationJournal of Climate, 2000
- The Atmospheric Hydrologic Cycle over the Arctic Basin from Reanalyses. Part I: Comparison with Observations and Previous Studies*Journal of Climate, 2000
- Increased Precipitation in the Norwegian Arctic: True or False?Climatic Change, 2000
- Measurements of precipitation and snow pack at Russian North Pole drifting stationsPolar Record, 1998
- Variability and Trends of Total Precipitation and Snowfall over the United States and CanadaJournal of Climate, 1994
- AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison ProjectBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1992