Evaluation of four methods of DNA distribution data analysis based on bromodeoxyuridine/DNA bivariate data

Abstract
Four published methods of DNA‐content histogram analysis (those of Fried, Dean and Jett, simplified Dean, and Fox) were compared using a double labeling of different cell populations. Partially synchronized and asynchronous cell populations were incubated with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) and then stained with an anti‐BrdUrd monoclonal antibody and propidium iodide (PI). The fractions of cells in the G1, S, and G2 + M phases were calculated by each method and compared with those derived from G1, S, and G2 + M areas plotted on BrdUrd/DNA bivariate histograms, taken as the “true” values. This procedure enabled an optimal choice of method for a given cell population.