Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
- 12 October 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery
- Vol. 148 (1) , 29-39
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812464020
Abstract
Objective: This study reviews the published outcomes related to sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (SNACC). Clinical presentation, radiographic diagnosis, pathology, treatment, and management outcomes of this uncommon disease are reported.Data Sources: PubMed database.Methods: A systematic review of studies for SNACC from 1960 to 2012 was conducted. A PubMed search for articles related to SNACC, along with bibliographies of those articles, was performed. Articles were examined for both individual patient data (IPD) and aggregate patient data (APD) that reported survivability. Demographics, disease site and spread, treatment strategies, follow‐up, outcome, and survival were described for IPD, and a meta‐analysis for survival rates was performed for APD.Results: A total of 55 journal articles were included. Individual patient data were reported in 39 journal articles, comprising a total of 88 cases of SNACC. Sixteen articles, totaling 366 patients that reported aggregate 5‐year survivorship pertaining to SNACC, were also included. Average follow‐up in the IPD was 51.2 months (range, 1‐198 months), and 5‐year survivorship was 63.5%. In the studies reviewed, surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy was the most common therapy used and resulted in the highest percentage of survivors. Aggregate patient data meta‐analysis revealed a 5‐year survival rate of 62.5%.Conclusion: This study contains the largest pool of SNACC patients to date. The data suggest that SNACC has a poor overall prognosis. It also suggests that surgery with postoperative radiotherapy is the most commonly used and may possibly be the most effective therapy.Keywords
This publication has 112 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neckAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology, 2012
- Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological researchJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Revascularization among patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a meta‐analysis of observational studiesEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2011
- Pitfalls in Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies: Lessons From a Systematic Review of the Risks of Stenting for Intracranial AtherosclerosisStroke, 2009
- A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing InterventionsWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2004
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Unsuspected Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in Secondary RhinoplastyAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1979
- Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square RootThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950