Time Estimation: Dependence and Independence of Modality-Specific Effects
- 1 December 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 21 (3) , 727-734
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1965.21.3.727
Abstract
80 Ss were required to reproduce 9 time intervals, ranging from 1 to 17 sec. duration, under 8 experimental conditions: the factorial arrangement of auditory and visual interval presentation, auditory and visual interval reproduction, and patterned and unpatterned stimulus filling the interval. Mode of stimulus presentation and of reproduction had no consistent effect on time estimation. Significant modifications occurred with repeated trials and reliabilities of duration estimations were consistently high.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct comparisons of auditory and visual durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964
- Auditory and Visual Time JudgmentThe Journal of General Psychology, 1964
- Proprioceptive Involvement, Psychophysical Method and Temporal JudgmentPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1963
- Reliability of Time Estimation by the Method of ReproductionPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1963
- The useful dimensions of sensitivity.American Psychologist, 1963
- A Further Note on Intersensory Differences in Temporal JudgmentPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1959
- Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- An evaluation of experimental methods of time judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950