Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction of N-Acetyl Procainamide and Procainamide in Humans
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 364-373
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198909000-00003
Abstract
Procainamide is a sodium channel blocker which prolongs QRS and QTc intervals, yet its major active metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), generally prolongs only QTc and has very different electro-physiologic and antiarrhythmic actions. In >50% of patients receiving chronic treatment with procainamide, plasma concentrations of NAPA exceed those of procainamide. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that NAPA might alter the disposition kinetics or pharmacologic actions of procainamide. Ten patients with frequent ventricular extrasystoles received intravenous (i.v.) infusions of procainamide alone (study day 1), procainamide and NAPA (study day 2), and NAPA alone (study day 3) at least 48 h apart. On study days 1 and 2, procainamide was administered at a constant rate for 4 h. On study days 2 and 3, NAPA was administered as a loading and maintenance infusion designed to reach a target pseudo-equilibrium plasma concentration of 8 μg/ml. NAPA increased procainamide elimination half-life (t½) from 275 ± 42 min (mean ± SD) on day 1 to 340 ± 74 min on day 2 (p < 0.01). A significant correlations was noted between the change in procainamide total clearance on day 2 relative to day 1 and the initial procainamide total clearance on day 1 (r = −0.77, p = 0.009). Findings were similar when procainamide fractional urinary excretion was considered (r = −0.89, p = 0.007). NAPA did not alter procainamide-induced QRS prolongation, but potentiated procainamide-induced QTc prolongation. The antiarrhythmic response to procainamide was not significantly altered by NAPA in seven of nine patients. One patient had greater arrhythmia suppression when NAPA and procainamide were combined than when either was administered alone. In one patient, NAPA apparently antagonized procainamide-induced arrhythmia suppression, but this effect was not reproducible. We conclude that accumulation of NAPA during procainamide therapy can alter both procainamide elimination as well as its electro-physiologic actions.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficient Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Complex Clinical Dosing Regimens: The Universal Elementary Dosing Regimen and Computer Algorithm EDFASTJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1987
- Rate-dependent effects of procainamide on his-purkinje conduction in manThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Cimetidine inhibits renal procainamide clearanceClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1984
- Dose and concentration dependent effect of ranitidine on procainamide disposition and renal clearance in man.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1984
- Cimetidine-procainamide pharmacokinetic interaction in man: Evidence of competition for tubular secretion of basic drugsEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1983
- Cimetidine and procainamide secretion by proximal tubules in vitroAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 1982
- N-Acetyl-procainamide kinetics in the elderlyClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1981
- Electrophysiologic comparative study of procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide in anesthetized dogs: concentration-response relationships.Circulation, 1979
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of procainamide infusions in relation to acetylator phenotypeJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1979
- Effect of procainamide on transmembrane action potentials in guinea-pig papillary muscles as affected by external potassium concentrationNaunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 1979