Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 201 (1) , 28.e1-28.e8
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.034
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal sizeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2009
- Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
- The use of customised versus population‐based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortalityBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: A French multicenter studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- First-Trimester or Second-Trimester Screening, or Both, for Down's SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- A united states national reference for fetal growthPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- The relationship between intrauterine growth restriction and preterm delivery: an empirical approach using data from a European case‐control studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Customised antenatal growth chartsThe Lancet, 1992
- Smoothing reference centile curves: The lms method and penalized likelihoodStatistics in Medicine, 1992