A decision support system for face-to-face groups
- 1 August 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Information Science
- Vol. 13 (4) , 211-219
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158701300404
Abstract
Several recent trends have converged to make the concept of Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) important at this time. This paper describes the design, development, and testing of one GDSS tool as an initial step toward building a compre hensive system. A network of microcomputers was used to implement this tool, then the author studied its use by a large number of groups in a controlled laboratory setting. The GDSS proved to have some beneficial impacts on the group process as well as on the final product (decision) for the groups using the computers, as compared to groups using a booklet, or groups with no help. Suggestions for future experimental inves tigations are offered, as well as potential techniques for impro ving and expanding the GDSS.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support SytemsMIS Quarterly, 1984
- A strategic planning network for non‐profit organizationsStrategic Management Journal, 1984
- Organizational Strategies for Personal Computing in Decision Support SystemsMIS Quarterly, 1981
- Value Analysis: Justifying Decision Support SystemsMIS Quarterly, 1981
- A Framework for the Development of Decision Support SystemsMIS Quarterly, 1980
- A COMPARISON OF DECISION QUALITY UNDER NOMINAL AND INTERACTING CONSENSUS GROUP FORMATS: THE CASE OF THE STRUCTURED PROBLEM*Decision Sciences, 1979
- Functional Leadership Behavior: Measurement and Relation to Social Power and Leadership PerceptionsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1977
- FIELD EXPERIMENTS WHICH COMPARED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DESIGN METHODS*Decision Sciences, 1976
- FUZZY SETS IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND IN CONSENSUS FORMATION SYSTEMSJournal of Cybernetics, 1976
- Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness.The Academy of Management Journal, 1971