On the debate over methods for estimating the clinically important difference
- 30 November 1996
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 49 (11) , 1223-1224
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00208-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The minimal important difference: Who's to say what is important?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniquesPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive proceduresPain, 1996
- Spirometry and Dyspnea in Patients With COPDChest, 1996
- Time Preference in Medical Decision Making and Cost - Effectiveness AnalysisMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Assessing the Clinical Importance of Symptomatic ImprovementsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements. An illustration in rheumatologyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in rhinoconjunctivitisClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1991
- Should study subjects see their previous responses: Data from a randomized control trialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Memory and its distortions.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1982