Assumptions Matter: Model Uncertainty and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment
Open Access
- 1 May 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 102 (3) , 487-492
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.487
Abstract
This paper examines how estimates of the deterrent effect of capital punishment depend on alternate choices of assumptions concerning the homicide process. Specific models of the homicide process represent bundles of these assumptions, which involve the unobserved heterogeneity, the relevant penalty probabilities for homicide choices, possible cross-polity parameter variation, and exchangeability between polity-time pairs that do and do not experience positive numbers of murders. We demonstrate how various assumptions have driven the conflicting findings from studies on capital punishment, and isolate a particular set of assumptions that are required to find a positive deterrent effect.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding aggregate crime regressionsJournal of Econometrics, 2010
- Model Uncertainty and the Deterrent Effect of Capital PunishmentAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2008
- The Scientific Model of CausalitySociological Methodology, 2005
- State Executions, Deterrence, and the Incidence of MurderJournal of Applied Economics, 2004
- Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel DataAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2003
- Crime and Punishment: An Economic ApproachJournal of Political Economy, 1968