The smoothness index
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 16 (11) , 1685-1691
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199816110-00016
Abstract
To introduce a new method, the smoothness index, for assessing the homogeneity of 24 h blood pressure reduction by antihypertensive treatment and to compare it with the trough : peak ratio; and to assess the ability of both indices to predict a reduction in the left ventricular mass index induced by treatment. In 174 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, enrolled in the Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation (SAMPLE), aged 20-65 years, we measured clinic blood pressure, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and the left ventricular mass index (echocardiography) before and after treatment with lisinopril at 20 mg with the addition of 12.5 or 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide as needed to reach a sufficient blood pressure reduction. The following parameters were computed for systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure: (1) hourly and 24 h blood pressure averages (+/- SD) at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of treatment; (2) hourly blood pressure changes from baseline after 3 and 12 months of treatment, and their average (+/- SD) over 24 h; (3) the trough : peak ratio after 3 and 12 months of treatment; and (4) the smoothness index after 3 and 12 months of treatment Similar calculations were also performed at the end of a final study month during which active treatment was withdrawn and placebo was substituted (n = 164). The smoothness index for systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure computed after 3 months of treatment was more closely related to its corresponding values after 12 months of treatment than the trough : peak ratio values computed after the same time periods were (r = 0.68 versus 0.38 for systolic and 0.68 versus 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure, respectively). The smoothness index showed an inverse correlation with the 24 h standard deviation of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = -0.25 and -0.16, P < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively, for 12 months of treatment), while the trough : peak ratio did not (r = -0.01 to -0.12, NS). A treatment-induced reduction in the left ventricular mass index was related to the smoothness index for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = -0.35 and -0.32, P< 0.001 with 12 months of treatment), but not to the corresponding trough : peak ratios. The smoothness index identifies the occurrence of a balanced 24 h blood pressure reduction with treatment and correlates with the favourable effects of treatment on left ventricular hypertrophy better than the commonly used trough : peak ratio.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation of Blood Pressure Variability From 24-Hour Ambulatory Finger Blood PressureHypertension, 1998
- Ambulatory Blood Pressure Is Superior to Clinic Blood Pressure in Predicting Treatment-Induced Regression of Left Ventricular HypertrophyCirculation, 1997
- Calculation of trough: peak ratio of antihypertensive treatment from ambulatory blood pressure: methodological aspectsJournal Of Hypertension, 1995
- Trough-To-Peak Versus Surface Ratio in the Assessment of Antihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure, 1995
- Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variabilityJournal Of Hypertension, 1993
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use in hypertension research and clinical practice.Hypertension, 1993
- Clinical relevance of nighttime blood pressure and of daytime blood pressure variabilityArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992
- Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 versus resting and ambulatory 24-hour intra-arterial blood pressure.Hypertension, 1992
- Relationship of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Mean and Variability to Severity of Target-Organ Damage in HypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1987
- Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.Circulation, 1978