Where is the Schema? Critiques
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 85 (4) , 1357-1380
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1963950
Abstract
This symposium features three critiques of the argument about schema theory proffered by Kuklinski, Luskin, and Bolland. First, Milton Lodge and Kathleen M. McGraw, of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, respond from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Then Pamela J. Conover, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Stanley Felman (also of Stony Brook) consider schema conceptualization mainly in terms of problems of measurement. Finally, Arthur H. Miller, of the University of Iowa, offers an information-processing approach to political schemas.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reasoning and ChoicePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategiesPolitical Behavior, 1991
- Public Judgments of Senate and House CandidatesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1990
- A Sociocognitive Model of Attitude Structure and FunctionAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1989
- Schematic Assessments of Presidential CandidatesAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- A Hierarchical Model of Attitude ConstraintAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- On the primacy of affect.American Psychologist, 1984
- Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the VoteAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral ChoiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the PresidencyAmerican Political Science Review, 1966