Sitting time and work patterns as indicators of overweight and obesity in Australian adults
- 23 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 27 (11) , 1340-1346
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802426
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing levels of physical inactivity and sedentariness are contributing to the current overweight and obesity epidemic. In this paper, the findings of two recent studies are used to explore the relationships between sitting time (in transport, work and leisure), physical activity and body mass index (BMI) in two contrasting samples of adult Australians. METHODS: Data on sitting time, physical activity, BMI and a number of demographic characteristics were compared for participants in two studies—529 women who were participants in a preschool health promotion project (‘mothers’), and 185 men and women who were involved in a workplace pedometer study (‘workers’). Relationships between age, number of children, physical activity, sitting time, BMI, gender and work patterns were explored. Logistic regression was used to predict the likelihood of being overweight or obese, among participants with different physical activity, sitting time and work patterns. RESULTS: The total reported time spent sitting per day (across all domains) was almost 6 h less among the mothers than the workers (P2). Univariate analysis found that, compared with men in full-time work, women who worked full-time (OR=0.42, CI: 0.24–0.74), part-time (OR=0.35, CI: 0.20–0.59) or in full-time home duties (OR=0.51, CI: 0.29–0.88) were about half as likely to be overweight or obese. Participants who reported high daily levels of sitting (≥7.4 h) were also significantly more likely than those who reported ‘low’ levels (2 than full-time working men (full-time: OR=0.44, CI: 0.25–0.78; part-time: OR=0.45, CI: 0.24–0.86), but the OR for BMI ≥25 among those in the high sitting category was attenuated (OR=1.61, CI 0.96–2.71). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a need for inclusion of measures of both activity and inactivity in future studies, so that the complex relationships between these behavioural determinants of BMI can be clarified.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obesity and the Environment: Where Do We Go from Here?Science, 2003
- Who does not gain weight? Prevalence and predictors of weight maintenance in young womenInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- Perceived Constraints and Social Support for Active Leisure Among Mothers With Young ChildrenLeisure Sciences, 2001
- Reliability and Validity Issues concerning Large-Scale Surveillance of Physical ActivityResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- The association between television viewing and overweight among Australian adults participating in varying levels of leisure-time physical activityInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Physical inactivity, sedentary lifestyle and obesity in the European UnionInternational Journal of Obesity, 1999
- Relationship of Physical Activity and Television Watching With Body Weight and Level of Fatness Among ChildrenJAMA, 1998
- Epidemic obesity in the United States: are fast foods and television viewing contributing?American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth?BMJ, 1995
- Television viewing and obesity in adult males.American Journal of Public Health, 1989