International Infectious Disease Law
- 2 June 2004
- journal article
- health law-and-ethics
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 291 (21) , 2623-2627
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.21.2623
Abstract
The International Health Regulations (IHR), the only global regulations for infectious disease control, have not been significantly changed since they were first issued in 1951. The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently engaged in a process to modernize the IHR. This article reviews WHO's draft revised IHR and recommends new reforms to improve global health, which include (1) a robust mission, emphasizing the WHO's core public health purposes, functions, and essential services; (2) broad scope, flexibly covering diverse health threats; (3) global surveillance, developing informational networks of official and unofficial data sources; (4) national public health systems, setting performance criteria, measuring outcomes, and holding states accountable; (5) human rights protection, setting science-based standards and fair procedures; and (6) good governance, adopting the principles of fairness, objectivity, and transparency. The WHO should ensure state compliance with health norms and generous economic and technical assistance to poorer countries. An important issue for the international community is how sovereign countries can join together to make global health work for everyone, the poor and the wealthy alike.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crossing the Species Barrier — One Small Step to Man, One Giant Leap to MankindNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- SARS: Political Pathology of the First Post-Westphalian PathogenJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2003
- THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL HEALTH LAW AND THE WHO IN THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC HEALTHPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2001
- International Health Regulations: putting public health on the centre stageThe Lancet, 1999
- Why Do Nations Obey International Law?The Yale Law Journal, 1997