Data and Methods Comparing Social Structure and Vegetation Structure of Urban Neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 19 (2) , 117-136
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920500394501
Abstract
Recent advances in remote sensing and the adoption of geographic information systems (GIS) have greatly increased the availability of high-resolution spatial and attribute data for examining the relationship between social and vegetation structure in urban areas. There are several motivations for understanding this relationship. First, the United States has experienced a significant increase in the extent of urbanized land. Second, urban foresters increasingly recognize their need for data about urban forestry types, owners and property regimes, and associated social goods, benefits, and services. Third, previous research has focused primarily on the distribution of vegetation cover or diversity. However, little is known about (1) whether vegetation structure varies among urban neighborhoods and (2) whether the motivations, pathways, and capacities for vegetation management vary among households and communities. In this article, we describe novel data and methods from Baltimore, MD, and the Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES) to address these two questions.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZLandscape and Urban Planning, 2004
- Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st centuryLandscape and Urban Planning, 2004
- The Struggle to Govern the CommonsScience, 2003
- Social Capital and the Collective Management of ResourcesScience, 2003
- Turfgrass revolution: measuring the expansion of the American lawnLand Use Policy, 2003
- Linking ecological and social scales for natural resource managementPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2002
- Urban Ecological Systems: Linking Terrestrial Ecological, Physical, and Socioeconomic Components of Metropolitan AreasAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2001
- Targeting the suburban urbanites: Marketing central‐city housingHousing Policy Debate, 1997
- Neighborhoods as stands in the urban forestUrban Ecology, 1984
- Man as a Maker of New Plant CommunitiesJournal of Applied Ecology, 1980