18F-FDG PET for Posttherapy Assessment of Hodgkin's Disease and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Systematic Review
- 12 December 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Vol. 49 (1) , 13-21
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.039867
Abstract
Although studies have shown that 18F-FDG PET, when used to assess the response of malignant lymphoma after treatment, has a strong ability to predict relapse, its diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice remains unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in detecting residual disease at the completion of first-line therapy of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Methods: We searched relevant articles from 1966 to July 2006 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Biological Abstracts, bibliographies, review articles, and textbooks without language restriction. One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Relevant individual patient data or subgroup data were provided by the investigators if they were unavailable from the publications. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves and confidence regions for summary sensitivity and specificity. Results: Nineteen studies consisting of 474 HD and 254 aggressive NHL patients were included. These studies had heterogeneity and suboptimal methodologic quality and reporting. Reported ranges for the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET in predicting disease relapse were 0.50–1.00 and 0.67–1.00, respectively, for HD and 0.33–0.77 and 0.82–1.00, respectively, for NHL. These estimates were similar when conventional imaging tests showed a residual mass. For HD studies, the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were similar irrespective of whether a residual mass was detected by conventional tests. Factors explaining the variability of diagnostic estimates were not identified. Conclusion: Although currently available evidence is still limited, 18F-FDG PET seems to have good diagnostic accuracy for assessing residual HD at the completion of first-line treatment. Clinical data on this use of 18F-FDG PET for aggressive NHL are more limited. Prospective studies with a more rigorous research design, conduct, and reporting would more reliably reveal the clinical diagnostic accuracy of this imaging modality.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revised Response Criteria for Malignant LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Mediastinal Bulky Tumour in Hodgkin’s Disease and Prognostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Post-Treatment Residual MassesActa Haematologica, 2004
- Clinical Decisions Associated With Positron Emission Tomography in a Prospective Cohort of Patients With Suspected or Known Cancer at One United States CenterJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Positron emission tomography scanning in the assessment of patients with lymphomaInternal Medicine Journal, 2004
- The role of PET imaging in lymphomaBritish Journal of Haematology, 2004
- Conventional imaging and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for predicting the clinical outcome of patients with previously treated Hodgkin's diseaseMolecular Imaging & Biology, 2004
- FDG-PET is Superior to Gallium Scintigraphy in Staging and More Sensitive in the Follow-up of Patients withde novoHodgkin Lymphoma: A Blinded ComparisonLeukemia & Lymphoma, 2004
- Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Evolving Concepts with Implications for PracticeHematology-American Society Hematology Education Program, 2004
- 18-FDG-PET-Befunde bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Morbus Hodgkin: Retrospektive Auswertung zur Korrelation mit anderen bildgebenden Verfahren bei der initialen Stagingdiagnostik und zum prädiktiven Wert bei VerlaufsuntersuchungenKlinische Padiatrie, 2003
- A Prognostic Score for Advanced Hodgkin's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998