Transnational Models for Regulation of Nanotechnology
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 34 (4) , 714-725
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00091.x
Abstract
There is much we do not know about nanotechnology. Despite its tremendous promise, nanotechnology today is mostly forecast and fervent hope. Predictions that spending on nanotechnology will increase from current levels of $13 billion to more than $1 trillion by 2015 are no more than that – simply predictions. Hopes that nanotechnology will be an essential part of solving the globe's energy, food, and water problems should be tempered by recalling a century of revolutionary technologies that failed to live up to their early promise such as nuclear energy, supersonic airplanes, or gene therapy. Many other questions continue to nip at nanotechnology's heels, not the least of which are debates about what is and is not technically feasible. Despite these uncertainties, we can have complete confidence in one aspect of nanotechnology's future – it will be subject to a host of regulations.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Yellow Light for NanotechScience, 2004
- AN END TO NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION?Chemical & Engineering News, 2004
- The BWC new Process: A preliminary assessmentThe Nonproliferation Review, 2004
- A little knowledge...Nature, 2003
- Implementing the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic PollutantsOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2002
- Consensus science, or consensus politics?Nature, 2001
- Dimensions of the Precautionary PrincipleHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1999
- Precautionary principle stifles discoveryNature, 1999
- United Nations: Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their DestructionInternational Legal Materials, 1993
- Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions