Public participation and marginalized groups: the community development model
- 25 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 2 (4) , 245-254
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00058.x
Abstract
Objectives To develop ways of reaching house-bound people and enabling them to give their views in planning and monitoring health and social care. Strategy HealthLINK – a project based in a community health council – explored ways of involving older house-bound people in the London Borough of Camden, in planning and monitoring health and social care using community development techniques. Results HealthLINK set up an infrastructure to enable house-bound people to have access to information and to enable them to give their views. This resulted in access for health and local authorities to the views of house-bound older people and increased the self esteem and quality of life of those who became involved. Conclusions Community development approaches that enable an infrastructure to be established may be an effective way of reaching marginalized communities. However, there are tensions in this approach between the different requirements for public involvement of statutory bodies and of users, and between representation of groups and listening to individual voices.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Puzzling out prioritiesBMJ, 1998
- Community Development and Health ProfessionalsPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1998
- 'The leeds declaration': Refocusing public health research for actionCritical Public Health, 1994
- Local voices. The bankruptcy of the democratic process.BMJ, 1992