Performance of a Urine-Screening Protocol
Open Access
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 85 (4) , 479-484
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/85.4.479
Abstract
The performance of a urinalysis protocol using screening Chem-strip-9™ dipstick analysis with selective sediment microscopy and culture is reviewed. Sediment microscopy performed on urine samples positive for leukocyte esterase, nitrite, protein, or blood, or when specifically ordered (15% of urinalyses) was reduced by 57.1%. Protocol urine culture performed when more than 5 WBC/high-powered field (HPF), more than 10 bacteria/HPF, or yeasts were found on sediment microscopy or with a positive nitrite test was done for 9.8%. Urine culture was specifically ordered for another 13.6%. Percent significant bacteriuria (≥105 colony-forming units/mL) was higher for protocol-generated cultures (37.1%) versus ordered cultures (17.2%). For urinalyses with ordered cultures, the protocol would have detected 89.8% of cases with significant bacteriuria. The protocol has facilitated detection of significant bacteriuria with good acceptance by clinicians. Cost savings achieved by reduction of sediment micros-copy was partly off-set by some increase in urine cultures performed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dipstick Chemical Urinalysis: An Accurate Cost-Effective Screening TestJournal of Urology, 1984
- Urine Screening Strategy Employing Dipstick Analysis and Selective Culture: An EvaluationAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984
- Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?The American Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Evaluation of a two-minute test for urine screeningJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1983
- The myth of the clean catch urine specimenUrology, 1981