Art or science?: Fifty years of marketing debate1
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Marketing Management
- Vol. 12 (4) , 243-267
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.1996.9964413
Abstract
Fifty years after Converse's (1945) classic statement on the “art or science of marketing”, the debate has come full circle. The holy grail of Science has not been attained and its pursuit has not only served to alienate practitioners from academics, but it has also done enormous damage to our discipline. This paper traces the development of the great debate, discusses the damaging postmodern critique of western Science and concludes that, as an Art, marketing should be judged by appropriately aesthetic criteria.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comment on: The commodification of marketing knowledgeJournal of Marketing Management, 1995
- On the marketing of marketing knowledgeJournal of Marketing Management, 1995
- Metaphors and competitive advantage: Evaluating the use of metaphors in theories of competitive strategyJournal of Business Research, 1995
- Postmodernism, marketing and the consumerInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 1994
- On Rethinking Marketing: Our Discipline, Our Practice, Our MethodsEuropean Journal of Marketing, 1994
- For Reason and Realism in MarketingJournal of Marketing, 1992
- Truth in Marketing Theory and ResearchJournal of Marketing, 1990
- On Method in Consumer Research: A Critical Relativist PerspectiveJournal of Consumer Research, 1986
- Marketing, Scientific Progress, and Scientific MethodJournal of Marketing, 1983
- The Nature and Scope of MarketingJournal of Marketing, 1976