Practicing and arguing for abstinence from smoking: A test of the double forced compliance paradigm
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 21 (2) , 119-129
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210203
Abstract
An experiment was conducted within a new paradigm for Festinger's theory of dissonance (1957): the double forced compliance paradigm (Joule, 1986a). Double compliance was used to test dissonance reduction following the execution of not just one, as in the classical paradigm, but two forced compliance behaviours. The first behaviour involved abstinence from smoking, and the second, writing a text for or against smoking. Based on the radical conception of the theory of dissonance (Beauvois and Joule, 1981; Joule, 1986b), subjects were expected to find tobacco deprivation more difficult after having written a text against smoking than before, and easier after having written a text in favour of smoking. The results confirmed these predictions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- When a compliance without pressure strategy fails due to a minority dissenter: A case of “behavioral conversion”European Journal of Social Psychology, 1988
- Tabacco deprivation: The foot‐in‐the‐door technique versus the low‐ball techniqueEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1987
- Twenty five on: Yet another version of cognitive dissonance theory?European Journal of Social Psychology, 1986
- DissonanceVersusSelf-Perception Theories: A Radical Conception of Festinger'S TheoryThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1982
- Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonancePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957