Presidential Prenomination Preferences and Candidate Evaluations
- 1 December 1988
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 82 (4) , 1309-1319
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1961762
Abstract
Recent research has altered our understanding of how voters select a candidate in U.S. presidential elections. Scholars have demonstrated empirically that issues, candidate personalities, candidate evaluations, and party identification interact in a dynamic simultaneous fashion to determine vote choice. Other researchers have shown that prenomination candidate preferences play an integral role in structuring the general election vote. We join together these two important trends to introduce and test a revised model of vote choice, using 1980 NES panel data. The results reconfirm that candidate selection is part of a dynamic simultaneous process and reveal for the first time that prenomination preferences are woven tightly into this causal web.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating ProcessAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1987
- The Partisan Affinities of Independent ‘Leaners’British Journal of Political Science, 1986
- The Carryover Effect in Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- The politics of disgruntlement: Nonvoting and defection among supporters of nomination losers, 1968?1984Political Behavior, 1986
- A Comment on Presenting Results from Logit and Probit ModelsAmerican Sociological Review, 1985
- Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel StudyAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- Divisive Presidential Primaries and Party Electoral Prospects, 1932-1976American Politics Quarterly, 1980
- Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the VoteAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential VotesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1975
- Discerning a Causal Pattern among Data on Voting BehaviorAmerican Political Science Review, 1966